Stop handing maintenance new equipment with ten years of problems installed.
Stage-gate reliability readiness for capital projects: evidence at every gate from concept to handover, verified against your own records - because the cheapest place to fix a maintainability problem is on paper, and the most expensive is at startup.
The demo plant has this module switched on. Open it and look around.
Gates with teeth
Concept, design, procurement, installation, commissioning, handover. A gate passes when its evidence exists - complete, ruled not applicable, or signed off as an exception. Never by silence.
Evidence, not checkboxes
Where the suite already holds the truth - criticality approved, lube points defined, spares listed, punch list clear - the requirement verifies itself against the record. Nobody can tick what the registry can see.
Your checklist, not ours
The starter set is a defensible baseline of the reliability work that dies quietly on most projects. Every line of it is yours to edit, per organization and per plant.
The machine arrives with its care system running.
Project assets are created in the shared registry while the equipment is still on a truck - so criticality, strategy, lubrication and spares are decided before startup, not discovered after it.
- Criticality and strategy approved before commissioning, in the same modules the rest of the plant runs.
- Lube points defined with products and schedules, so the first service is already on a route when the machine starts.
- Day one, it is watched like the rest: the new asset joins asset health, skills lanes, and the walk-arounds immediately.
Satisfied requirements over total, with exceptions visibly outside the number. An exception never reads green.
Gates are decided by people, and it shows.
The software never passes a gate. It shows the evidence, blocks the button while items stand open, and records who decided, when, and what the checklist looked like at that moment.
- Exceptions are signed, not silent. A gap that passes a gate carries a reason, an approver, and a date - and keeps the project amber until it closes.
- Punch severities have teeth: A is safety, B blocks startup, and the handover gate watches exactly those two.
- Cost of ownership beside the purchase order: lifetime arithmetic on your own figures, because the purchase price is the smallest number on the invoice.
The dearer pump is the cheaper machine. Arithmetic on the project's own figures - never a recommendation.
Every module reads the same records.
The asset registry you build for this module is the one every other module runs on. Add the next one and it starts loaded.
Root cause analysis
Investigations with cause trees, evidence, and corrective actions that actually close.
Criticality and maintenance strategy
Rank what matters, then build the PM program those rankings justify.
Asset Health
One number over every critical asset: healthy or at risk, and the named reasons why.
Lubrication management
Tag every point, run every route, and catch a failing bearing while it is still a planning problem.
Skills and competency
Who is qualified for which work, where the dangerous gaps are, and the plan that closes them.
Startup is too late to find out.
Walk the demo plant's pipeline: a project passing its gates on the registry's own evidence, and one being held honestly.